TFL just broke their Tacoma

Seems to me the ADD system did its job and broke instead of a more expensive part. The question is going to be should the ADD be strengthened or is this just a weird coincidence? I doubt major recall since the part isn't exactly new.

I can imagine a hundred people doing the same thing that TFL did and 99 of them having no problems. It isn't like Toyota didn't test the truck in this fashion. They did and they torture tested it in worse conditions.

Like I said earlier, things happen. Parts break. Like @Fightnfire said Jeeps have a similar Achilles' heel.

For my money, I'd bet this will turn into much ado about nothing in 6 months like the waste gate issue.
I have off roaded Jeeps and Toyotas for over 50 years . I have never seen a Jeep FAD failure ? Lots of front U Joint and rear axle fails . Not sure what Fire guy has heard . Maybe because some old ones would fail to engage because of a leak in the vacuum line ?
 
I have off roaded Jeeps and Toyotas for over 50 years . I have never seen a Jeep FAD failure ? Lots of front U Joint and rear axle fails . Not sure what Fire guy has heard . Maybe because some old ones would fail to engage because of a leak in the vacuum line ?

There's a whole aftermarket support network for deleting the FAD and/or replacing with with beefier components in the Jeep off-road world. It is not as susceptible to issues as the Toyota ADD but it's something Jeep people talk about.

The FAD, or front axle disconnect device, is a theoretical weak spot in the solid axle of the Jeep Wrangler. It's made up of two components, a collar, and a hole in the axle housing. The FAD is a fuel mileage improvement device that's used in some JL Wrangler and JT Gladiator vehicles. It frees up the front axle from rotating when four-wheel-drive is not engaged.

It's become enough of an issue that some newer Rubicons are shipping without a FAD device.
 
I know what it is .. It is not needed in an off road Jeep .Just would like to hear about your personal experiences ?
 
I know what it is .. It is not needed in an off road Jeep .Just would like to hear about your personal experiences ?

Needed is an interesting word because it's on the vast majority of them and many of the hardcore off-road group and over landing group delete it or modify it.
 
Needed is an interesting word because it's on the vast majority of them and many of the hardcore off-road group and over landing group delete it or modify it.
That is something bad that comes from forums. People start deleting or adding or modding things not out of necessity but because, "Everyone on the forum is doing it", with no real reason behind it. Then it's cemented in stone, "this stock part is crap". You start following those fads and the next thing you know you have "angry eyes" on your Jeep and you look like a tool....
 
I agree with this as well @Dusdaddy, but I'm probably still getting tires right away. LOL. However, we're just going to do tires and sliders and wait to see if we need skid plates or not. No lifts or new suspension until we see if we need that or not. So I appreciate this forum and all of the help and resources everyone provides. And because it's more general, you get more different thoughts and experiences to balance what's on the specific forums too.
 
I agree with this as well @Dusdaddy, but I'm probably still getting tires right away. LOL. However, we're just going to do tires and sliders and wait to see if we need skid plates or not. No lifts or new suspension until we see if we need that or not. So I appreciate this forum and all of the help and resources everyone provides. And because it's more general, you get more different thoughts and experiences to balance what's on the specific forums too.
Oh yeah, you do you. Never worry about what others think or do. And changing stock tires is extremely common. I used to go to a local custom wheel/tire shop and get take-offs cheap. Until stock wheels became $1200 a piece for some reason.
 
Oh yeah, you do you. Never worry about what others think or do. And changing stock tires is extremely common. I used to go to a local custom wheel/tire shop and get take-offs cheap. Until stock wheels became $1200 a piece for some reason.
You are definitely not your average old fart and it does kind of look like a Dyson, but I've always liked it myself, but it is polarizing.
 
Lol ..yeah, I have been in tech my whole life from avionics on aircraft to electronics manufacturing. And turning wrenches with my father on trucks/jeeps. I'm a sucker for "new". Sometimes it doesn't work out but sometimes it turns into everyday life. Like auto tranny's and fuel injection, EVs will become everyday life, no sense fighting it.
 
Seems to me the ADD system did its job and broke instead of a more expensive part. The question is going to be should the ADD be strengthened or is this just a weird coincidence? I doubt major recall since the part isn't exactly new.

I can imagine a hundred people doing the same thing that TFL did and 99 of them having no problems. It isn't like Toyota didn't test the truck in this fashion. They did and they torture tested it in worse conditions.

Like I said earlier, things happen. Parts break. Like @Fightnfire said Jeeps have a similar Achilles' heel.

For my money, I'd bet this will turn into much ado about nothing in 6 months like the waste gate issue.
I think the best thing Toyota could do is a full presentation of the findings. I suspect the ADD didn’t engage fully or some other one off situation occurred. If that’s not the case and it’s really a weak link (maybe because the new engine has more torque?) they still should be upfront about it and start planning for a recall.
 
I think they even went over the same section, looked like they had video of the way back down, but didn't show the same section going up. But it didn't break an if the camera was horizon locked a couple of those sections were pretty steep.
 
I meant terrible as in if you're going to title your video "We went where TFL broke their new Tacoma" then make a point to stop and point out the exact area and spot. Talk about the driving conditions at that spot, recreate the scene a little. Tell us if you're in 4LO or 4HI. They bashed the truck 2 or 3 times but I don't really think I learned anything.
 
I meant terrible as in if you're going to title your video "We went where TFL broke their new Tacoma" then make a point to stop and point out the exact area and spot. Talk about the driving conditions at that spot, recreate the scene a little. Tell us if you're in 4LO or 4HI. They bashed the truck 2 or 3 times but I don't really think I learned anything.
Yeah, I totally agree with you.
 

New video from R4T. Same trail with a long bed!
Notice the best journalism in the piece; at Timestamp 00:12, when the guy in the foreground says they are going to "Try and Break Something" the smartest one of the three gives his (leg raised) opinion on the left to his partner's stupid idea.

Ben will save us with useful Tacoma content.
 
@GMT 900 I will try my best! We're getting a huge snowstorm on the day I'm supposed to pick it. So I'll get a quick test of the tires. But the next morning I'm having Wildpeak AT4Ws installed so I'll get to do a quick comparison of the snow performance between the two which should be interesting. It's going to rain and the snow on top of that and I imagine it'll be icy. I'll get to test 4WD pretty much when I pick it up. I'll just need to be careful so I don't wreck it right away as I'm not trying to break something. 🤞

I think the one thing I found confirming in that video is those tires are not very good in the snow/ice, but they at least got them pretty far. I think they just started with the YouTube videos, so they are just learning, but R4T is an off road Tacoma shop so I did expect a little more from that video!
 
Looks like the TFL Tacoma is fixed. They posted a short showing it on a trail today. I hope they have more information on what broke and how.
 
Back
Top