Search results

California corn fuel dont have much BTU .

People want to know the MPG difference between the Famous 5.7 Hemi and the 3 litre . on similar Ram trucks . same day .

The old adage " Never cry wolf" should be a You Tubes channel"s first commandment .

High torque, low rpm = Big bearings and high tension rings for long life . However they do effect fuel economy .

What about the VR line ?

I think he will not be invited to press events ,but hope you are correct .

The Chinese have really upped the game over Warn on the cost/reliability equation . 8274 still the king ,however, their recent products ?

Is it the EPA? lol

The advantage is fuel economy and carbon output . Otherwise why go electric ?

I think peak torque @ 4700 is an issue on an engine powering a generator . Only reason to use the 3.6 is to save money.

I have never seen a gasoline powered Generator for industrial use . The torgue from diesel allows for low RPM fuel savings and long life .

A small diesel would work better as a generator, over a torque less V6 . But Stellantis has chosen profit over capable/ reliability once again .

The only interest in Ram trucks is the comparison between the 5.7 and the 3.0 . Just get the one that will deliver the less amount of loss .

My 1990 Comanche with Uni body construction, could only muster 2200 lbs .

I know what it is .. It is not needed in an off road Jeep .Just would like to hear about your personal experiences ?

I have off roaded Jeeps and Toyotas for over 50 years . I have never seen a Jeep FAD failure ? Lots of front U Joint and rear axle fails . Not sure what Fire guy has heard . Maybe because some old ones would fail to engage because of a leak in the vacuum line ?

We will get Tim to call Nathan . I would like to be wrong .

It is not surprising. Toyota gave Roman a call asking if they would like to have access to any Toyota invites or loaners in the future. Just like Ford ,Subaru ,and land rover did .

Have you done any unloaded testing on Fuel economy on your 6.2 between 91 and 87 ? The EPA i think says 1 MPG difference between the 6.2 and the 5.3 . If it turned out to be similar , with the same fuel, the 6.2 would seem to be the best choice .

This was more about your comment on going to the dealer first . I, as an owner of an expensive truck would rather do the best i could, too figure out the problem, before hearing from a dealer service writer . I realize that TFL will get good treatment ,but us regular folk ,will not be as fortunate .